Jesus Guerrero, who was ordained as a deacon in 1997, sued the Roman Catholic Diocese of Lubbock after they refused to remove his name from a list released in 2018 of clergy who they deemed as having credible accusations of sexual abuse lodged against them. In an 8-1 decision released Friday, the state’s highest court concluded that the Diocese of Lubbock could lawfully include Guerrero's name on the list of accused clergy.

The new version of Book Six clarifies more carefully what the crimes are, what the parameters are for bishops who have to determine and dole out punishments, and how to better protect the Church as a community, meaning any public scandal associated with a crime will also play a factor in what punishment a guilty party receives.

“While it is recognised that the term ‘contra sextum’ has been used in the tradition to express something far wider than adultery, it should also be recognised that the term, as used in the law, is no longer adequate to meet the demands of a contemporary canonical approach to sexual offences against minors and their equivalent in law and can distort the values which the Church wishes to protect in prosecuting these offences”.

Father said he was never offered an opportunity to rebut the allegations at any stage. He has never been charged with any crime. “I think it is a tremendous miscarriage of justice for both sides,” Father's attorney said. “It just shows there is absolutely no due process, there is no one in the room managing this situation at all, to the harm of both sides. The Catholic Church doctrine of mercy just isn’t part of the equation down at that chancery.”

The judge threw out the defamation suit filed by Monsignor, which alleged that the Diocese defamed him when its spokesperson stated in an NPR interview that she believed his claims of misconduct and apologized to the accuser. Monsignor's attorney said, “We think if you polled 100 people out at Target and Walmart and read them those statements, 99 if not 100 would agree [Diocese] endorsed the charges and accused [Monsignor] of child abuse and molestation. If you’re a neutral person, you don’t apologize for someone.”

Pope Francis on Saturday urged families, educational and public institutions to tackle with renewed determination the scourge of child abuse, paedophilia and child pornography, describing them as "psychological murder". “Even today,” he pointed out, “we note that the first reaction of many families is to cover up everything.” “It is always there in other institutions, even in the Church,” he said, adding, “we must fight this old habit of covering up”.

In a letter to the parish community, Cardinal Blaise Cupich said a review by the Archdiocesan Office of Child Abuse Investigations and Review and an outside investigator, including multiple unsuccessful attempts to obtain information from the accuser, concluded the allegations "cannot be substantiated." The cardinal added he resolves to see Sullivan's "good name restored" and that "healing now must be the pathway forward for all of us."

While many canon law experts believe the norms in Vos Estis represent a turning point in the church's efforts to hold bishops accountable, others believe much could be improved upon, including greater transparency on disclosing when investigations are taking place, the need to mandate the use of lay experts, and clarity on the status of bishops removed from office following an investigation.

the Canadian bishops have rolled out a new online reporting system where complaints, either of sexual abuse or coverup, against the Church’s shepherds can be made. Called the “Canadian Reporting System for Sexual Abuse or Cover-up by a Catholic Bishop."

Archdiocesan attorneys moved for damages from the accuser's attorneys, arguing that they willfully violated a ban on initiating litigation against the church, which automatically took effect when the archdiocese filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. That prompted the accuser's lawyers to remove the archdiocese from the lawsuit, leaving the priest and an insurance company as the remaining defendants.

The introduction of “vulnerable adults” into Church law means that we couldn’t continue work only in child protection anymore. We need to include also the dignity and care for e.g. a seminarian who is exploited by the Rector or a 35-year-old laywoman who goes to a priest for spiritual direction because she’s fighting with her husband.

A new law published Friday makes clear that Vatican city-state prosecutors and judges have jurisdiction over Holy See cardinals and bishops and need only the pope’s consent to proceed with investigations and trials against them. The law abrogated a regulation that said only the tribunal’s highest appeals court, which is made up of three cardinals, could judge cardinals and bishops accused of criminal offenses.

The bishop is the first U.S. Church leader to undergo an investigation pursuant to Vos Estis Lux Mundi (You Are the Light of the World), Pope Francis’ 2019 motu proprio, which holds bishops accountable for negligence in responding to allegations of sexual abuse involving minors and lays out universal procedures for investigating bishops accused of sexually abusing minors or vulnerable adults or of failing to remove others credibly accused.

Williams and Massingale said the church needs to overhaul how it selects, screens and trains potential priests and clergy members. Williams said he's concerned that the formation process for young men going into ministry hasn't been radically changed in response to the abuse crisis. He said he sees young priests entering ministry with "abject racism and sexism" and a lack of pastoral skills, which he said speaks to a deeper issue with the formation process. "The vestiges are still there that will bring fruit later in continuing episodes of abuse … . If [young priests] have not been formed well enough in these basic skills, then there are some demons buried there, that will come to fruition. And this crisis will be ongoing," Williams said.

“There is no evidence that the Church as a whole and the Archdiocese of Milwaukee hasn’t already taken all possible steps in addressing issues surrounding clergy sexual abuse. We also do not understand the legal basis for the inquiry. We also question why only the Catholic Church is being singled out for this type of review when sexual abuse is a societal issue."

In 2002, the U.S. bishops enacted the Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People, known as the Dallas Charter, its most essential feature being the "zero tolerance" approach to sex abuse. Such an approach is not fair. It fails to distinguish between inappropriate touching and a rape. And it ruined men who otherwise were outstanding pastors and gifted human beings.

Catholics’ hearts “are broken by this” scandal, she said. “All priests’ hearts are broken by this, although most of them have carried the burden unbelievably well. We deeply believe that faith and spirituality is part of our healing,” she said, and that “engaging in a constructive dialogue with the Church can help bring more pastoral care to survivors who need it and can’t find it.”

People working in canon law usually don’t have this kind of experience when it comes to canonical crimes, he said, resulting in poorly worded questions and not following up on what a person says. A precise and professional line of questioning also helps in “trying to unmask a lie,” he added. “There are many, many cases, the majority I would say, that are true (accounts of abuse), but, unfortunately, right now we are seeing an increase in which there are many false accusations,” he said, or sometimes the accused is found guilty without sufficient proof.

The Cardinal Pell case highlights the awkward situation that would prevail if a canonical process came to a different conclusion than a criminal or civil process. Imagine a priest convicted of equally impossible charges, but without the resources to appeal the case to the High Court. If a canonical investigation concluded that the wrongfully convicted priest was innocent, would the Church have the courage to make that finding, with its attendant consequences?

Jesuit Fr. Damián Astigueta, professor of canon law at the Gregorian University, wrote that transparency does not mean universal or public access to sensitive or confidential information, but it is sharing information with those who have a right to see it. Authorities in charge of investigating and acting on accusations must seek the truth and follow the principles of real justice, which guarantees due process, the right of defense and presumption of innocence for the accused.